Online educational resource on achieving indoor environmental quality with radiant based HVAC systems
Not for profit educational resource on indoor environmental quality.
Radiant Floor Heating

Important message:

Consumers are upgrading HVAC systems to higher efficiency equipment and controls without understanding that often such new equipment when operated the old way, does not provide energy savings.

For example, a 98% efficient boiler only achieves such high performance when it operates at low temperatures typically below 80 deg F (27 deg C).

Regardless of the use of programmable thermostats, when a 98% efficient boiler is run at 180 deg F (82 deg C) it still only achieves a nominal 85%.

Likewise if people are relying on programmable thermostats for savings it’s important to know that a thermostat only tells the boiler that it "could" run but not at what temperature it "should" run at. This is not a trivial matter.

If you are upgrading to reduce your energy consumption, you have to look at the entire system – it’s not enough just to replace the equipment.

 


 

  

Programmable Thermostats - Part I
Copyright (c) 2012, Robert Bean, R.E.T., P.L.(Eng.), www.healthyheating.com and content contributors
see also: Programmable Thermostats - Part II (includes boiler efficiency )

Suffice to say there is no shortage of debates about setback thermostats. We remain neutral since valid research supports their use in some applications.

Rather than perpetuate the debate amongst the real research and plethora of anecdotal energy savings claims, we thought we would present a different side that says, “just because a control could potentially reduce energy use, doesn't mean that it is operated in such a way that energy reductions are achieved.

The following is a list of scientific papers many which have studied how people actually use these devices with success and shockingly how they often end up using more energy than what they were intended to save.

Why? Because many people find them too complicated to operate so they are operated incorrectly.

We hope you find this useful, if so tell your friends and be sure to share your stories at our Linked In page where we have devoted an entire segment to Programmable Thermostats: In Search of the Holy Grail

Thermostat and Sensory Resources

  1. Meier, A.K., et al, How People Actually Use Thermostats, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California Davis, University of California Berkeley

  2. Karjalainen, S., Vastamäki, R., Occupants Have a False Idea of Comfortable Summer Season Temperatures, Proceedings of Clima 2007 Well Being Indoors

  3. Plourde, A., Programmable Thermostats as Means of Generating Energy Savings: Some Pros and Cons, University of Alberta School of Business, March 2003

  4. Walker, I., Meier, A.K., Residential Thermostats: Comfort Controls in California Homes, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California, March 2008

  5. Karjalainen, S., Koistinen, O., User problems with individual temperature control in offices, Building and Environment, Vol. 42, No. 8, pp. 2880–2887, 2007

  6. Karjalainen, S., The characteristics of usable room temperature control, Ph.D. Dissertation, VTT Publications 662, ESPOO 2007

  7. Tariku, F., Kumaran, M.K., Fazio, P., Thermostat setback effect in whole building performance, National Research Council, 2008

  8. Karjalainen, S., Why It Is Difficult to Use a Simple Device: An Analysis of a Room Thermostat, VTT, 2007

  9. Karjalainen, S. 2007, Gender differences in thermal comfort and use of thermostats in everyday thermal environments, Building and Environment, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 1594-1603.

  10. Erlandson, T.M., Cena, K., de Dear, R., Gender differences and non-thermal factors in thermal comfort of office occupants in a hot-arid climate, Elsevier Ergonomics Book Series, Volume 3, 2005, Pages 263-268

  11. Matos, R., Wang, K., Jensen, J.D., Jensen, T, Neuman, B., Svensson, P., Arendt-Nielsen L., Quantitative sensory testing in the trigeminal region: site and gender differences,  J Orofac Pain. 2011 Spring;25(2):161-9.

  12. Blankenburg M, Boekens H, Hechler T, Maier C, Krumova E, Scherens A, Magerl W, Aksu F, Zernikow B., Reference values for quantitative sensory testing in children and adolescents: developmental and gender differences of somatosensory perception, Pain, 2010 Apr;149(1):76-88. Epub 2010 Feb 6.

  13. Kempton, W., Two Theories of Home Heat Control, Cognitive Science 10 I 75-90 (1986)

  14. Karjalainen, S., Usability guidelines for room temperature controls, Intelligent Buildings International ,Vol. 2, Iss. 2, 2010

  15. Kempton, W., Feuermann, D., Mcgarity, A.E., Air Conditioner User Behavior in a Master-Metered Apartment Building,  Proceedings of the Fourth Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates, Houston, TX, September 15-16, 1987

  16. Norman, D.A.: The Design of Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (1988)

  17. Jacko, J.A., Human-computer Interaction: Interaction design and usability, 12th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, China, July 2007

  18. Andersen, R.V., Olesen, B.W., Toftum, J., Modelling Occupants’ Heating Set-Point Prefferences, Proceedings of Building Simulation 2011: 12th Conference of International Building Performance Simulation Association, Sydney, 14-16 November 2011

  19. de Groot, E., Spiekman, M., Opstelten, I., Dutch Research into User Behaviour in Relation to Energy Use of Residences, PLEA 2008 – 25th Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture, Dublin, 22nd to 24th October 2008
     

  20. Larsen, T.S. et al, Occupants influence on the energy consumption of Danish domestic buildings – State of the Art, Aalborg University, Department of Civil Engineering Section for Architectural Engineering, December 2010
     

  21. Homework 1: Observing everyday user interfaces, Georgia Tech Sonification Lab , School of Psychology and the School of Interactive Computing
     

  22. Manning, M.M.; Swinton, M.C.; Szadkowski, F.; Gusdorf, J.; Ruest, K., The effects of thermostat set-back and set-up on seasonal energy consumption, surface temperatures and recovery times at the CCHT Twin House Facility, NRCC-48361, Institute for Research in Construction (IRC), National Research Council Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2007
     


Related pages
Programmable Thermostats - Part II (includes boiler efficiency )
Radiant design guide
Effectiveness coefficient, (Φ ) for temperatures in various countries

 
 

Home | Seminars | Solutions | Heating Cafe | Contribute | Online Help | Bean's Blog | About Us | Glossary
Privacy Policy | Legal | Contact Us | Site Map |
Carlson-Holohan Award| Send Us Your Comments

Copyright © 2011 Healthy Heating. All rights reserved.1 2 3
Site developed by WebworX.ca
 
Donate using PayPal, Credit Cards Accepted