Energy and Indoor
Environmental Quality in Modern or Modernized Buildings
Visit this link for a slide show on mechanical schematics and architectural
details. Allow 45 to 60 seconds to load.
Glossary of Terms
bibliography on radiant cooling and heating.
Learn more about response times with different radiant surfaces.
All about floor heating: there are many myths when it comes to radiant systems. You can read over 22 of the more popular twisted tales here. Radiant Mythology
Learn how to avoid the six
mistakes in radiant based HVAC systems
Should you fully insulate
under concrete slabs on or below grade?
Below grade comparison
Downward heat loss
Academic Scores due to IEQ
Advice for Consumers
Bibliography: Indoor Air Quality
Budgeting for indoor climates
Enclosures, Part I
Building Enclosures, Part II
Built to Code: Means what?
Science w/ SEM
Concrete & Embedded Pipes
A Condition of Mind
Design: Downward heat loss
Design: Sample Commercial
Duct Tape: Not for
Earth Tube Heat Exch.'s
Engineers: Do I Need
Pipes in Concrete
Exergy & Sustainability
Exposome: An Introduction
Flooring R values
Flooring and Boiler Efficiency
Health and HVAC systems
Heat, Air, Moisture Modelling
Heated Hardwood Flooring
History of Radiant Heating
History of the HRV/ERV
Human Thermal Plume
Humidity & the Environment
HVAC & Energy Efficiency
Does Not Equal IEQ
Hybrid HVAC Systems
IEQ and Energy
IEQ and Health
IEQ Self Assessment
Indoor climate system scores
Kitchen Range Hoods
LED Lights & Lamps
Paying for Downgrades
Radiant Based HVAC Guide
Radiant Cooling, Introduction
Radiant Cooling, Projects
Radiant Cooling, Systems
Radiant Design Guide Level 1
Radiant Design Guide Level 2
Radiant Design Guide Level 3
Radiant Enables Efficiency
Radiant Facts and Myths
Radiant Gone Wild
History, 1868 A.D.
History, 1500 B.C
Radiant Mistakes to Avoid
Radiant Tube Depth: Effects
Walls for Retrofits
Pressure of Light
Reflective Insulation: Myths
Six Rules for
Snow Melting Storm Data
Thermal Comfort & IAQ
Thermal Comfort: Perspective
Thermal Comfort Survey Part I
Thermal Comfort Survey
vs Skin Sensors
Under slab insulation
Water Heater Efficiency
Water Heaters as Boilers
for Cold Climates
Walls for Cold Climates
Solar and heat pumps
Send us your feedback
Others are saying...
The Carlson - Holohan Industry
Award of Excellence
Indoor Air Quality Images
Want to See
Quality @ Home
Quotes on IEQ
For the kids
Indoor Air Quality
Click image above for a quick chart for
determining quantity of tube
“The designer should check
water velocity throughout the system and select finned-tube
or baseboard elements on the basis of velocity as well as
Source: 2012 ASHRAE
Handbook—HVAC Systems and Equipment, Hydronic
Heat-Distributing Units and Radiators, pages 36.4 and 36.5
Infloor Radiant Design Guide: Heat Loss to Head Loss
Copyright (c) 2006 Robert Bean, R.E.T., P.L.(Eng.), Editor, All Rights Reserved
support visit our
visitor services page.
Readers of this article also
Validating radiant cooling and heating designs - new
environments: Self assessment
your indoor climate system score?
"ball park" your budget for indoor climate control.
Thermal Comfort: A 40 grit perspective for consumers
code: What does it mean for consumer thermal comfort?
Comfort: A Condition of Mind
hydronic underfloor radiant heating systems, the systematic design process can be described as a 12 step program beginning with the heat loss and ending with the head loss.
topic is part of our Professional
Step 1 - Heat Loss,
Heat loss influences everything in the design process. One can’t begin to think about materials or assembly until this key calculation is done. Heat loss is Btu’s lost. For my non technical accountant friends I describe a Btu as the amount of heat a match puts out. How many matches
must burn in an hour is what we’re talking about. Is it 10, 100 or 100,000?
Another way to look at a single Btu is about the same
amount of energy it would take to haul a 55 lb weight up
a 10 ft flight of stairs. You want to guess how many
times you'd have to haul a 55 lb weight up a set of
stairs? In any other profession whether it’s a doctor, a cab driver or the teenager selling burgers – no one wants to hear guessing as to how much when it comes to paying for anything. You shouldn’t be guessing in hydronics either. You have to do the math. How many burning matches is it going to take to keep the place warm? How many gallons are going to have to circulate through the floor carrying those matches? The heat loss calculation provides answers to these questions and you can’t go to
step two unless you do step one.
So do you got it? You have to do 1 before
you do 2...
Note: Heat loss can be reduced by selecting and placing suitable
under slab insulation between the
earth and the heated slab;
the holes and cracks; as well as building
high performance walls and ceilings and using
climate appropriate windows and doors. Learn what types to use and not use by clicking here.
Step 2 – Flux (Btu/hr/sf)
We’re not talking about soldering here we’re looking at how many matches must burn per hour per square foot. If your heat loss calculation shows you need 10,000 matches in an hour and your available floor area is 1000 sq. ft. then your flux = 10,000/1000 = 10 Btu/hr/sf. Imagine the
equivalent heat of 10 matches burning per hour every square foot. You want to try guessing 100 or 1? Not a good idea. Do the math. Heat
Here's how we categorize buildings based on flux.
Step 3 - Surface Temperature (˚F)
One of the critical but simplest calculations to perform is the floor surface temperature. The floor can’t be too hot (max 84˚F, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-2004) or it will be uncomfortable and if it isn’t warm enough it may not be able to transfer the Btu’s. To calculate the surface
temperature simply divide the flux by 2 and add the result to the desired operative temperature. The value of 2 is a ‘heat transfer coefficient’ or HTC and before continuing let’s be very clear the value of 2 is for radiant
heated floors and is a nominal number which means it’s not exactly
2. It’s a different number for walls and ceilings and it also changes for cooling. For our heated floor example we take our flux of 10 Btu/hr/sf divide it by 2 (units = Btu/hr/sf/˚F) which = 5˚F plus our
operative temp of 70˚F = 75˚F surface temperature. At 75˚F we will be able
to transfer 10 Btu/hr/sf to keep the room at 70˚F.
Use the Heat Transfer Calculator
Recommended surface temperatures
between surface temperature, flux and operative
temperatures (click to open full view).
Step 4 - Floor Coverings (ft2●h●˚F/Btu)
Contrary to popular misunderstanding, the
flooring heat flux is not affected by the
as long as the floor is not a highly polished mirror like surface.
It s important not to confuse the heat flow through
a floor with the energy flow from the floor
surface itself - they are in fact two separate
calculations. In the first case it is conductive
transfer and in the latter radiant and convective
transfer. Carpet or concrete have for all practical purpose identical abilities to
emit radiant energy
and so the only
difference floor coverings have on the design is in the tube spacing and fluid temperature. The greater the sum of R values of the floor assembly above the tubes, the closer the tubes and or the hotter the fluid temperature must be. The hotter the fluid temperature the greater the back
loss and thus the higher the insulation required below the tubes.
High temperatures also destroy boiler and heat-pump
efficiency. For greater details on this topic see our
recommend reading, "Impact of
surface characteristics on radiant panel output".
Note: More about radiant heating and hardwood floors.
Step 5 – Spacing (inches)
Simplified Radiant Design Graph for Spacing & Fluid Temps:
(see also Advanced version: How to use
the ASHRAE Design Graph for radiant cooling and heating panels)
Up to this point the building specifications have influenced the radiant design. In step 5 and step 6, the radiant designer begins to influences the systems in terms of capital cost for equipment and operating costs for fuel and power. Spacing and
average fluid temperatures are joined at the hip. The greater the tube density (closer the spacing) the lower the average fluid temperature
- the higher the efficiency from a boiler, heat pump or solar
system. The less tube density the hotter the fluid temperature
and the lower the
heating plant efficiency. Technically there is no right or wrong spacing other than what impact it may have on surface
temperature consistencies (what I call the surface temperature quality
surface efficacy), flow rates, fluid temperatures
and plant efficiency. So if you want a poor performing
heating plant and poor quality surface temperatures use the
least amount of tube of the lowest quality in a inefficient home. If this is not your
cup of tea - use the highest quality pipe and lots of it, 6" to
8" o.c. spacing are good choices if you plan on doing
cooling and heating. Can you go wider? Sure - 12" o.c. in a well
insulated basements is standard stuff and you might get marginal
benefit from dropping down to 8" o.c. but again the pipe is
the lowest cost component of the entire HVAC system, is the least
accessible and affects efficiency and comfort.
For the moment we’re going to ignore tube pattern layouts, tube depth and upward resistances
which play an important role. To learn more about these critical
elements see our student
software tool design validation service.
Step 6 – Average Fluid Temperature (˚F)
For a given flux and R-value the closer the spacing the lower the average fluid temperature.
Fluid temps drive heat transfer. You could have a 100 US gpm running through the 1000 sf floor and if the temperature in the pipes is the same as the floor or room
temperature there will be zero heat transfer – none – zero - zip. Flow is the container but
temperature drives heat transfer and temperature comes from burning matches…the more flames the hotter the fluid. The hotter the fluid the wider the spacing…the wider the spacing the greater the
inconsistencies in surface temperature. The closer the tube spacing the lower the fluid temperature the greater the efficiencies from your boiler
or heat pump. As mentioned above Step 5 and Step 6 are linked.
To determine fluid temperature at your selected tube
spacing, floor covering and heating flux use the
Simplified Radiant Design Graph
Step 7 – Flow,
All you have to is take a look at the units and see that flow is a container per unit of time. That’s it. In the U.S. the standard units are US gallons per minute. Imagine a one gallon milk jug. When we calculate the flow all we’re doing is figuring out
how many one US gallon containers carrying heated fluid have to travel through the floor in one minute. What influences the flow is the amount of Btu's we have to move into the space every hour
(q)(see step 1) plus the characteristics of the fluid (lbs/USgal &
Btu/lb oF ) and temperature difference (Δt oF) between the fluid going into and coming out of the floor.
This is how the formula looks:
USgpm = q,
Btu/hr / (60 min/hr ●
cp Btu/lb oF
● Δt oF)
Table showing typical
hydronic heating and cooling systems
Table showing typical
and specific heats (cp)
for various mixtures of water/glycol. For 100% water the
density is 8.34 lbs/USgal and the specific heat is
1 Btu/lb oF
● Δt oF
A few last words on this step 7…the intent of this article is to give a general overview of the steps to designing radiant systems.
Our professional development courses at
http://www.healthyheating.com/seminars.htm provide detailed explanations as to fluid characteristics, heat loss calculations and selecting ∆t’s.
Contact us if you wish to host a course for your region.
Step 8 - Flow per Loop (US gpm per loop)
Once you figure out how many one gallon buckets have to rotate through the zone in one minute the next is figure out if all that water should travel through one loop or several loops. This where hydronic design turns into hydraulic design. This is also
where we introduce one of those fancy dinner party words called “iterative”. This means repetition, recurrence, or reiteration. Step 7, 8, 9, 11, and 12 is about repeatedly playing with the sequence and with the values to optimize the design for easiest installation with the lowest
pressure drop for the least operating and capital equipment cost. We could decide to rotate the fluid through one loop but that one loop might have to be really long which drives up the head loss
and thus the operating costs. We could increase the pipe diameter to reduce the head loss but then the cost of the
pipe goes up as does the installation difficulty. We could split the flow into a number of loops to reduce the flow per loop and thus the head loss but then the cost of the manifold would go up. This is where experience and software reduce the design optimization to the least amount of
engineering time. Ultimately, one wants to end up
specifying a circulator which is appropriate for the
application. For residential systems, most circulators
will have small fractional horse power motors with
performance curves defined by less than 20 US gpm and 20
ft of head. Once the differential pressure starts to
exceed say a nominal 14 to 16 ft of head, one should
starting looking for better optimization.
Step 9 -
Pipe Diameters (inches)
Once you have the flow and have decided on the number of loops (and by deduction the flow per loop) then you can pick a diameter of pipe which regulates the flow velocity between a nominal 1.5 to 5 feet per second and head losses between 1 ft. to 4 ft. per 100 ft of pipe. The bigger the pipe the less
differential pressure required which may mean a smaller pump which then equals less cost but it also means more money for pipe and associated items like fittings.
Most radiant designers fail to understand that flow velocity should be the determining factor in pipe selection.
In heat transfer, bigger pipe does not equal more heat - learn more.
Step 10 - Total Tube (ft)
This step is easy since all you have to do is convert your selected spacing from step 5, into total tube by using a tube density multiplier
or the formula below. If the tube spacing is 12” o.c then every square foot you need one foot of pipe so the multiplier is 1. If you
have 6 “ o.c. spacing you’ll have twice as much as 12” o.c. so your multiplier is 2. Take your area in sq. ft. times the multiplier and you have the total footage. See our design manuals for tube density multipliers
or use the quick chart provided.
Total tube in ft = Area in sf
· (12 inches/ft
spacing in inches)
ex. 1000 sf with 8 inch spacing
= 1000 sf X (12 inches/ft / 8 inches)
= 1500 ft of tube
Step 11 - Loop Length (ft)
At this stage you divide the total footage by the number of loops and you have loop length. The experienced guys when playing with spacing and fluid temperatures can work the iterations so the calculated loop lengths reduce waste from a roll and really
talented designers can fine tune the system head loss so circulators operate at their highest efficiency. Conversely some designers will work backwards from standardized loop lengths. Either way is fine.
Step 12 - Head Loss (ft of head)
Once you have determined the flow per loop and know the loop length you can calculate how much
differential pressure is required to move the quantity of fluid at the prescribed
So there you have it - heat loss to head loss. Without crunching the numbers you end up with inefficient systems which are over priced and under perform - contributing to customer dissatisfaction.
People who visited this page have also visited our Radiant Cooling Pages.
Sample radiant cooling calculation procedure.